Discussion about this post

User's avatar
wmj's avatar

It may be beyond the scope of this essay, but nevertheless I feel obligated to mention it:

Readers may wonder, “how on Earth did the Bolsheviks win? How did this mass-murdering, economy-collapsing, war-communism government, which never had much electoral support in the first place, manage to defeat the various professionally-led, western-backed armies opposing it?”

And the answer is, basically, they promised something the Whites couldn’t or wouldn’t: land reform. They enlisted and marshaled enormous support by promising to seize and redistribute land. Compared to that, the Whites’ vague promises to enact pluralistic liberalism were pretty thin gruel.

It’s no coincidence that the most fearsome units on both sides of the war - the Don Cossacks and Latvian rifles (not to mention the Finnish nationalists) - were explicitly fighting for self-determination.

If there’s any lesson in that - and it may well be that circumstances are so different as to make any lessons useless - it’s that people need a tangible reason to fight. “What’s in it for me if I help you win?” When push comes to shove, appeals to principle just won’t do.

Expand full comment
Chet's avatar

Excellent essay!

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts